Sometime I ought to mention the two times I actually had a gay experience, but I don't feel like that now. Instead, I'll just talk about how I spent/wasted my day. Besides setting up much of my Twitter account and this blog, I have been viewing countless clips of "bisexual" porn. That usually means a threesome or more consisting of at least two men and a women. The men and women then liberally interact with each other. Thus the men get pussy and cock at one go.
I think it works pretty well. The female prevents the situation from being a pile of cocks and balls, although that might be ideal for some. As much as I may have come across as a closet gay in my first post, I'll never stop loving women.
Indeed one of the bonuses of bisex threesomes is that the woman (hopefully) finds the concept of two men together to be erotic. I've found that women these days are becoming more and more interested in seeing two men have sex. It's almost as if they were copying the guys who have been getting off on lesbian sex for who knows how long?
This is a welcome sign in my opinion. A good deal of the stigma associated with homosexuality in males can, if my instincts are right, be traced back to the contempt of women who saw in the gay man a rejection of the family. It must be kept in mind that the family was once the very seat of morality, and always will be during periods of decline. Homosexuality was thus anti-nature par excellence, an un-sexing of man. Women, who were and still often are in a state of dependence on men, must have felt threatened materially by the risk of a husband "degenerating." What women needed foremost from their husbands was security, a bedrock upon which to raise a family. Men were therefore expected to take on those qualities that lead to predictability, stability, resilience, etc. One could say these were the very hallmarks of morality, that homosexuality could overthrow.
These remarks are very sketchy, so don't take them as any last words I have to say on the subject. If I am on to something, that one could expect deep ties between the woman's liberation and gay rights movements.
Back on the subject of MMF threesomes, I find much to praise in how the men and the woman work cooperatively to get off. In the process, the man in a sense concedes to the woman by acknowledging the appeal and the power inherent in cock. There is a recognition of its goodness irrespective of whether one is a man or a woman, dick works its magic. In my imagination I can almost see, after their first threesome, a boyfriend look upon his woman and with a mere gesture concede that the penis has supremacy in the realm of pleasure. He will have no other option that to join in the great phallic procession.
Once again I could rightly be accused of unfairness. The female body has its undeniable charms. It must be said, however, that cock nicely compliments that which the woman cannot. Perhaps bisexuality is the most rational form of sexuality precisely due to the imperfection seen in the bodies of men and women? This would almost certainly hold true if the ultimate aim of sexuality is pleasure, but that seems to be a shaky hypothesis. Nevertheless, I see no reason why it cannot remain a viable mode of sexuality for certain individuals who are well suited for it. Who exactly is well suited for it? That's a whole other inquiry!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment